Another World Is Possible

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Bring on Miliband, the Son of Blair.

Charles Clarke and Alan Milburn today launch their so called policy debate. This is a smokescreen for a fairly obvious attempt to promote a Blairite, anti Brown candidate. Although Charles Clarke and Alan Milburn have at different times dearly hoped that either one of them would be seen as this candidate, those around them know that there is no support for either of them in Parliament and even less in the Labour and Trade Union movement. So the last remnants of Blairites are desperate for Miliband to stand as the last standing standard bearer of Blairism.

Understandably David Miliband is seen as natural successor to Blair because he was Blair's head of policy in Number 10 responsible for the back room development of the policy programme implemented by New Labour over the last decade. Parachuted into a safe seat by the New Labour machine, Blair then promoted him into the politically safe yet high profile role of environment secretary and given the warm, positive, uncontentious role of tackling climate change. Some anxieties were expressed when he was seen to be largely one large soundbite and delivering very little but when has this worried the Blairites. Panic also almost broke out when Miliband stumbled in the Commons over the bird flu outbreak.

Nevertheless you have to give Blair his due as a political operator. Positioning Miliband in this way set up the prospect of Miliband being ideally placed if the Brown leadership successsion faltered. Blair has been absolutely desperate to stuff Brown and derermine his own successor. Miliband has been quietly and stealthily promoted particularly amongst trusted members of the media as his natural and privately chosen successor.

Now the polls are running against Brown, exactly as we predicted, the Blairites have launched their pre-emptive coup. This could be the first time in history a coup has been launched against someone not just before he has become a leader but even before he has become a formal candidate for leadership!

My view is straightforward. What are all these people worried about? Why have all this backstairs plotting? Bring on the candidates and let's have an open debate on the future of the Labour Party, the Government and the country.

There is no difference in substance between Brown and Miliband or Clarke or Milburn. They have all developed, promoted and voted for the same policies for ten years. They are the policies which have lead us to our lowest standing in the polls for nearly 20 years and facing the prospect of a majority Tory government.

The attempt to divert the leadership election into personality politics based upon image not substance completely misses the point that it is the effect of New Labour policies in the real world that has undermined support for Labour.

The promotion of Miliband reminds many of us of the time when John Smith died and Tony Blair was promoted as the youthful, leader of the party without anyone knowing what his politics were or the policies he would promote. At least with Miliband we know what his politics are. They are New Labour/Blairite neo con to the core.

So let's have the leadership election and bring on the "big clunking fist" and the "son of Blair" for our grass roots campaign to challenge politically.

10 Comments:

Anonymous susan press calder valley CLP said...

Gordon Brown is sounding increasingly right-wing and seemingly obsessed with "Britishness" and weird initiatives forcing immigrants to do hard labour before they get "citizenship." He is thereby alienating all wings of the Party. Even the right think this is too much. No wonder Milburn and Clarke see an opportunity here.
If they do mount a challenge, all bets are off and Gordon can no longer assune he will be next leader. But their natural constituency is not the same as ours and it will not affect our chances of getting the ballot.As John's appearance on Newsnight showed brilliantly, we have everything to gain from a contest in the media spotlight. It is the Blairites who have everything to fear.And they are imploding before our eyes.If we unite around one serious left candidate, anything could happen.

10:41 AM 
Blogger Sham said...

Well if you're saying there must be an open debate, with Milliband allegedly joining the field, isn't it time to call on your supporters to stop telling Meacher he has to withdraw?

Perhaps you're right, and a 4-way battle for the leadership will determine our future direction.

10:52 AM 
Anonymous liz said...

Just as Michael Howard promoted David Cameron/George Osborne and look at how well they are now doing!

I think David Miliband would be an excellent leader and feel he is more likely to win the support of floating voters at the next election. I do not think Gordon Brown appeals to "middle England" and feel that we may well lose the next election should he lead the party. Yes - to win another election one must have a younger, personable leader. I regret that all the policies in the world matter less than the personality and media savvy of a leader. That is why "brand Cameron" is doing well and why Tony Blair has won three elections! I wish the PM had never stated his intentions of leaving office! I shall miss him!

11:58 AM 
Blogger Gregg said...

Miliband has so far managed to shave 10,000 votes off Labour's majority in the once ultra-safe South Shields constituency. Hardly a good prospect for increasing Labour's support.

12:58 PM 
Anonymous current voter said...

I think No. 10 is listening to its own PR people too much. The country (let alone the party) do NOT want another inexperienced, young, personable politician to run the country. It is far to important a job to give someone like Milliband a go at it just because he looks pretty and sings a fine song.

Lives are at stake and I for one do not feel like passing control of the big red button to another who will be so scared of the responsibility they go running to daddy Bush for his opinion. Give Milliband another 15 years and then he may be ready. Until then - it's John for us voters - the one who knows how important the job is.

1:40 PM 
Anonymous frenetic said...

On sky news this morning, They put up bg digital images of the leadership contenders: yet again no sign of JM, so natually i rang up and complained, we should all do this, no media blackout on our watch!

btw, a heads up for an event in sheffield, it looks like all the leading Brownites will be there, and Hazel Blears!

regards

frenetic

http://www.futureforlabour.co.uk/

3:52 PM 
Anonymous daniel said...

Might be worth asking Peter Kilfoyle to nominate McDonnell?:

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/peter_kilfoyle/2007/02/we_are_told_by_charles.html

11:13 PM 
Anonymous h said...

How about a Miliband/McDonnell debate then?! Actually I wouldn't mind debating with him myself as I am probably of similar age to him yet my life's totally different to his now - the lack of flexible working opportunities for women with children or in fact anyone with caring responsibilities has been all over the media today; shame it's taken them so long to work this out! I don't think I'd want to work more than a couple of days aggregate per week unlike the Chinese woman who's just been on Newsnight who wants to go and work in Bejing instead of keeping pigs and looking after her kids in a remote village (at the moment she sends her husband but he wants to come back) who has the same problem as me of no childcare. We shouldn't all have to be slaves of capitalist econmics anyway but it would also be good to be able to work temporarily when you needed to for example, perhaps because of the nature of the work or because you needed to earn a sum of money quickly for example - at the moment this is often very difficult with childcare unless you have family who can do it as you tend to have to book childcare weeks, months or terms in advance. My life is also differnt from Miliband's in that it seems I can remember when being left-wing and a socialist was not a dirty word; more something to be admired for it meant you had principles and it also provided an inspirational vision of the future - such as without war and nuclear; discrimination etc which is lacking now; when he can't or more like won't.

I think Miliband probably will stand as 1) they keep denying it and no can mean yes in Politics and 2)because he is relatively young then if he falls flat on his face they will say he has plenty of time to try again and will try to rehabilitate him in the manner of fallen celebrities so he can't lose really!

The Daily Politics really messed up today when they showed a picture supposed to be John who wasn't John and got his name wrong but people emailed straight away to complain so I don't think they'll be that careless again!

Perhaps Pazo isn't doing long interviews with John as he won't be able to run rings around him! I asked him back at conference if he would feature John more and he looked doubtful at first but when he realised how serious I was he seemed to come round!

If it's more fun being an underground cult figure maybe we could get some J4L "bumper stickers" as they call them in America printed for all to see......

What I'd like is for the next Labout leader not to have to start each PMQS with reading out the names of those killed recently in Iraq and expressing condolences yet again; I'd like there to be no troops in Iraq by then and I'd like workers for our emergency services and public services such as the NHS to be recognised as the greatest workers in our country; not the fat cats and private equity firm employees and so on.This of course would mean more work to break down Britain's class ridden society which is still at the root of some of the snobbish attitudes which still exist.

11:57 PM 
Anonymous left wing and of it said...

are they going to annouce the timing of the leadership election as soon as the local/Scot/Welsh elections over

Always good to know the timing to plan ahead?

12:17 AM 
Blogger Chris Vernon said...

Miliband gave a very interesting lecture on Monday 5th March: “The transition economy: a future beyond oil?”

See my analysis of his lecture here:
UK Government: "energy security and climate change"

Was this the Government’s first “peak oil” speech? Focusing on oil, considering ending the UK’s dependence on oil over the next 15-20 years, creating a post oil economy and calling for “demand reduction - radically reducing our energy needs through much greater energy efficiency.” I think it could be.

7:57 AM 

Post a Comment

<< Home